{"created":"2023-05-15T14:44:07.784688+00:00","id":1036,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"7128c5ed-1e03-47c2-8ec3-9b3b5e0bcecd"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"1036","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"1036"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:meigaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001036","sets":["98:123:130"]},"author_link":["1882"],"item_2_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2016-07-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"249","bibliographicPageStart":"233","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"32","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"明治学院大学法律科学研究所年報 = Annual Report of Institute for Legal Research"}]}]},"item_2_description_40":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Article","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_2_description_5":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"【共同研究 : 主要民事判例研究会】","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_2_publisher_33":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"明治学院大学法律科学研究所"}]},"item_2_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN10036169","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_2_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"2185-2278","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_2_version_type_16":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"山下, 良"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"1882","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2018-03-06"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"annual_legal_32_233-249.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.7 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"annual_legal_32_233-249.pdf","url":"https://meigaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/1036/files/annual_legal_32_233-249.pdf"},"version_id":"13df688f-9ba6-4d84-b4ae-c50f84e35b03"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"いわゆるファイナンス・リースによる延払条件付売買契約によって工作機械が売買されたが、買主が割賦金の支払を怠ったため、売主が契約を解除して目的物の引渡しを請求した事案において、解除後に残代金を提供した買主の受戻しの主張が認められなかった事例 （東京地裁平成24年9月25日判決（平成24年（ワ）第14006号動産引渡請求事件）・判例集未搭載）","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"いわゆるファイナンス・リースによる延払条件付売買契約によって工作機械が売買されたが、買主が割賦金の支払を怠ったため、売主が契約を解除して目的物の引渡しを請求した事案において、解除後に残代金を提供した買主の受戻しの主張が認められなかった事例 （東京地裁平成24年9月25日判決（平成24年（ワ）第14006号動産引渡請求事件）・判例集未搭載）"}]},"item_type_id":"2","owner":"3","path":["130"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2016-09-06"},"publish_date":"2016-09-06","publish_status":"0","recid":"1036","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["いわゆるファイナンス・リースによる延払条件付売買契約によって工作機械が売買されたが、買主が割賦金の支払を怠ったため、売主が契約を解除して目的物の引渡しを請求した事案において、解除後に残代金を提供した買主の受戻しの主張が認められなかった事例 （東京地裁平成24年9月25日判決（平成24年（ワ）第14006号動産引渡請求事件）・判例集未搭載）"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":3},"updated":"2023-05-15T15:36:48.570839+00:00"}