{"created":"2023-05-15T14:44:45.571646+00:00","id":1808,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"ffbc5530-5213-46b7-ad15-aa2d43859ab3"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"1808","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"1808"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:meigaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001808","sets":["238:239:246"]},"author_link":["3521","3522"],"item_2_alternative_title_19":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"Fiduciary Duty Not to Compete with the Corporation for Directors : The right of intervention (“Selbsteintrittsrecht”) should not have been abolished"}]},"item_2_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2007-12","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"7","bibliographicPageEnd":"74","bibliographicPageStart":"59","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"明治学院大学法科大学院ローレビュー = Meiji Gakuin University Graduate Law School law review"}]}]},"item_2_description_40":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Article","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_2_description_5":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"論説","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_2_full_name_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"3522","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"HUANG, Jui-i"}]}]},"item_2_publisher_33":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"明治学院大学大学院法務職研究科"}]},"item_2_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA11966539","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_2_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1349-4376","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_2_subject_17":{"attribute_name":"日本十進分類法","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"325.2","subitem_subject_scheme":"NDC"}]},"item_2_version_type_16":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"黄, 瑞宜"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"3521","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2018-03-07"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"lawreview7_59-74.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"4.7 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"lawreview7_59-74.pdf","url":"https://meigaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/1808/files/lawreview7_59-74.pdf"},"version_id":"5ad689a6-f1ca-4158-acc2-e90c2dd1522e"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"取締役の競業避止義務違反と会社の救済に関する一考察 : 介入権制度は廃止されるべきであったのか","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"取締役の競業避止義務違反と会社の救済に関する一考察 : 介入権制度は廃止されるべきであったのか"}]},"item_type_id":"2","owner":"3","path":["246"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2011-09-20"},"publish_date":"2011-09-20","publish_status":"0","recid":"1808","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["取締役の競業避止義務違反と会社の救済に関する一考察 : 介入権制度は廃止されるべきであったのか"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-05-15T17:10:43.128710+00:00"}