{"created":"2023-05-15T14:43:49.402698+00:00","id":675,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"4b5a2d6b-7e0e-4188-8c55-54e1749b5572"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"675","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"675"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:meigaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000675","sets":["98:99:115"]},"author_link":["1414","1415"],"item_2_alternative_title_19":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"Case Study on Civil Code, and Financial Instruments and Exchange Act: Decision of Osaka High Court, Feb. 22th, 2013"}]},"item_2_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2015-09-30","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"168","bibliographicPageStart":"137","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"99","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"明治学院大学法学研究 = Meiji Gakuin law journal"}]}]},"item_2_description_40":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Article","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_2_description_5":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"【判例研究／Case Note】","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_2_full_name_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"1415","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"KURASHIGE, Yachiyo"}]}]},"item_2_publisher_33":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"明治学院大学法学会"}]},"item_2_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA11963574","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_2_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1349-4074","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_2_version_type_16":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"倉重, 八千代"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"1414","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2018-03-06"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"hougaku_99_137-168.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"498.4 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"hougaku_99_137-168.pdf","url":"https://meigaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/675/files/hougaku_99_137-168.pdf"},"version_id":"2315a563-6191-4088-813a-e2f496fe3fb6"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"成年後見開始取消審判を受けて間もない時期に行われた投資信託等の金融商品取引により生じた損失に関する、顧客から証券会社に対する不法行為に基づく損害賠償請求につき、当該顧客が十分な判断能力を有していなかったことなどを理由として、適合性原則違反等の主張が認められ、原判決が変更され、請求が一部認容（過失相殺2割）された事例","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"成年後見開始取消審判を受けて間もない時期に行われた投資信託等の金融商品取引により生じた損失に関する、顧客から証券会社に対する不法行為に基づく損害賠償請求につき、当該顧客が十分な判断能力を有していなかったことなどを理由として、適合性原則違反等の主張が認められ、原判決が変更され、請求が一部認容（過失相殺2割）された事例"}]},"item_type_id":"2","owner":"3","path":["115"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2015-10-20"},"publish_date":"2015-10-20","publish_status":"0","recid":"675","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["成年後見開始取消審判を受けて間もない時期に行われた投資信託等の金融商品取引により生じた損失に関する、顧客から証券会社に対する不法行為に基づく損害賠償請求につき、当該顧客が十分な判断能力を有していなかったことなどを理由として、適合性原則違反等の主張が認められ、原判決が変更され、請求が一部認容（過失相殺2割）された事例"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-05-16T18:59:58.760964+00:00"}