{"created":"2023-05-15T14:43:58.062564+00:00","id":857,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"06b22c48-9754-4b6b-af44-9d5d7590d798"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"857","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"857"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:meigaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000857","sets":["98:123:126"]},"author_link":["1693"],"item_2_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2012-07-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"223","bibliographicPageStart":"215","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"28","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"明治学院大学法律科学研究所年報 = Annual Report of Institute for Legal Research"}]}]},"item_2_description_40":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Article","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_2_description_5":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"共同研究：成年後見法制の実務的・理論的検証―制度導入から10年を節目として","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_2_publisher_33":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"明治学院大学法律科学研究所"}]},"item_2_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN10036169","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_2_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"2185-2278","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_2_version_type_16":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"黄, 瑞宜"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"1693","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2018-03-06"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"annual_legal_28_215-223.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"220.6 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"annual_legal_28_215-223.pdf","url":"https://meigaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/857/files/annual_legal_28_215-223.pdf"},"version_id":"c5b49754-4cd3-4b60-b4ba-5161e1718680"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"会社は公司法第185条1項2号の規定にしたがい、営業又は財産の全部若しくは主要部分の譲渡につき、もし、発行済み株式総数の3分の2に未満の株主が出席した株主総会である場合、当該規定に違反し、その株主総会で行われた決議が決議方法の違法であるとされる事例（最高法院民事判決100（2011）年度台再字第56号2011年9月22日判決―株主総会決議無効再審確認請求事件）","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"会社は公司法第185条1項2号の規定にしたがい、営業又は財産の全部若しくは主要部分の譲渡につき、もし、発行済み株式総数の3分の2に未満の株主が出席した株主総会である場合、当該規定に違反し、その株主総会で行われた決議が決議方法の違法であるとされる事例（最高法院民事判決100（2011）年度台再字第56号2011年9月22日判決―株主総会決議無効再審確認請求事件）"}]},"item_type_id":"2","owner":"3","path":["126"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2014-11-20"},"publish_date":"2014-11-20","publish_status":"0","recid":"857","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["会社は公司法第185条1項2号の規定にしたがい、営業又は財産の全部若しくは主要部分の譲渡につき、もし、発行済み株式総数の3分の2に未満の株主が出席した株主総会である場合、当該規定に違反し、その株主総会で行われた決議が決議方法の違法であるとされる事例（最高法院民事判決100（2011）年度台再字第56号2011年9月22日判決―株主総会決議無効再審確認請求事件）"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-05-16T18:52:29.411096+00:00"}