ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To

Field does not validate

To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

  • RootNode

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 13社会学部
  2. 1社会学・社会福祉学研究
  3. 132号(2010年2月)

On “Benevolent Totalitarianism”

http://hdl.handle.net/10723/39
http://hdl.handle.net/10723/39
e43eea8d-40ef-4296-a023-73f668b52d35
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
shakaifukushi132_1-39.pdf shakaifukushi132_1-39.pdf (559.9 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2010-11-10
タイトル
タイトル On “Benevolent Totalitarianism”
言語
言語 eng
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 totalitarianism
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 “Homo Sacer”
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 “experience machine”
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 “the brain in a vat”
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
著者 INABA, Shin-ichiro

× INABA, Shin-ichiro

INABA, Shin-ichiro

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Since the last days of 20th century, namely after September 11 of 2001, we have got some cautions about the coming of a new kind of totalitarianism in advanced societies. (e.g. Sheldon Wolin on “Inverted Totalitarianism”.) Shozo Fujita, one of the early prophets of new totalitarianism, formulates such new totalitarianism as “totalitarianism toward <comfort>”, inspired by Hannah Arendt. This type of totalitarianism might, in contrast to classical totalitarianism, need no explicit tyranny or despotism, but only liberal institutions of property rights and free market economy. While realizing welfare of its people through capitalistic mass consumption, it decomposes and renders unnecessary the public reason of them, without any explicit violence and oppression. For Fujita himself, just like Arendt, remembering Rosa Luxemburg, the reason why we have to criticize this “totalitarianism” is clear. It is because, even in such “totalitarianism”, capitalism couldn’t survive without exploitation of “the outside”, namely, non-capitalist communities and natural environment. But what if such capitalist development is possible without such exploitation and, at least, explicit violence? On what foundation can we criticize such “benevolent totalitarianism”? If we found the reason for criticizing it in the degradation of public reason and civic virtue, such a critique couldn’t avoid the danger of petitio prinpicii. In this essay, I try to find some ways to criticize such “benevolent totalitarianism”, avoiding petitio prinpicii. Because, in a certain sense, “benevolent totalitarianism” could be seen as a version of perfect utilitarian politics, I would try to make such criticism from within a utilitarian perspective as possible.
書誌情報 明治学院大学社会学・社会福祉学研究 = The Meiji Gakuin sociology and social welfare review

巻 132, p. 1-39, 発行日 2010-02
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 1349-4821
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AA11966426
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
日本十進分類法
主題Scheme NDC
主題 364
出版者
出版者 明治学院大学社会学会
資源タイプ
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 Article
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 15:35:36.091234
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3