WEKO3
アイテム
Indication of country of origin on food ―How it is justified and negative effects to the international trade―
http://hdl.handle.net/10723/2094
http://hdl.handle.net/10723/2094bcda8881-be0e-4f6a-ae1a-6155eff46ef8
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
annual_legal_28_55-70.pdf (109.7 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2014-11-20 | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | Indication of country of origin on food ―How it is justified and negative effects to the international trade― | |||||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||||
| その他のタイトル | 食品の原産国表示―その正当性と国際貿易に与える影響― | |||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | Indication of country of origin | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | TBT Agreement | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | Legitimate objectives | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | Not more restrictive than necessary | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||
| 著者 |
TAKAHASHI, Teiji
× TAKAHASHI, Teiji
|
|||||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||||
| 識別子 | 1678 | |||||||
| 姓名 | 髙橋, 梯二 | |||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||
| 内容記述 | Following Japan and Korea, the United States and Australia have introduced the country of origin labelling requirement in recent years. The EU stated in November 2011 its adoption of mandatory indication of country of origin in the new regulation regarding the food labelling. While, the compulsory indication of country of origin has some negative effect to trade, its objective may be justified as a right of consumers to information. Then, it may be compatible with the texts concerned of the TBT Agreement of the WTO. However this labelling system has some technical and practical problems which could induce a nature of "more restrictive than necessary". At the international level, there is not a common recognition on the compulsory labelling requirement. In this context, the recent report on the disputes under the framework of the WTO on the US.COOL has indicated some legal interpretation in relation to the obligations assumed in the TBT agreement and GATT agreement. However, this dispute has not yet been finalized. In the situation where discussions are intensified in the international arena, Japan, as a country that has led this system, should not be much preoccupied by the coordination of interests of stakeholders inside in Japan, but be much responsible for the international harmonization. In any case, it shall be avoided to be inaccurate to induce mislabelling, and not to be too confusing or obscure for consumers in the food labelling. |
|||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
| 内容記述 | 研究論文 | |||||||
| 書誌情報 |
明治学院大学法律科学研究所年報 = Annual Report of Institute for Legal Research 巻 28, p. 55-70, 発行日 2012-07-31 |
|||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 2185-2278 | |||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10036169 | |||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||
| 出版者 | 明治学院大学法律科学研究所 | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
| 内容記述 | Article | |||||||
